reproductive freedom
For an object lesson about why it infuriates me when the Dana Milbanks of the world assume that the forced pregnancy lobby has some sort of monopoly on assessing morality,.
I think it's safe to say that the answer to the key question here is "no": Can you trust a breast cancer organization whose staff and board lie about medical.
Clark-Flory: This explanation has been met with reasonable skepticism for a number of reasons. For one, the organization has faced increasing pressure from antiabortion activists to cut all ties to.
I had been meaning to get to Douthat's argument about how requiring employer-provided health care packages to provide coverage for contraceptives is the death knell of civil society or something..
For the birthday of Roe v. Wade, allow me to note again that it was a straightforward application (1, 2) of long-entrenched constitutional values, it has already been watered down.
Some excellent news from Jessica Arons: Today, in a huge victory for women’s health, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced that most employers will be required to cover.
This won't be a surprise to longtime readers, but I agree 100% with Atrios about Perry changing his position to oppose abortion in cases of rape or incest. These exemptions.
Always a terrible idea. That, no coincidentally, always hit the women who can least afford it the hardest.