Michael Mukasey
Some eminently predictable buyer's remorse:When President Bush tapped Michael B. Mukasey to lead the scandal-plagued Justice Department nine months ago, Senator Charles E. Schumer could not say enough good things.
I guess it's time to go back to this from Ben Wittes:I know what you're thinking: If they confirm Mukasey without answers, the Democrats will once again be caving and.
You may recall Ben Wittes arguing that once Mukasey was dutifully confirmed he wouldn't be able to stonewall because the Democrats would suddenly have more leverage him because Mukasey would...need.
How about that: new, Chuck Schumer-approved Attorney General Michael Mukasey stonewalls an inquiry into the destruction of CIA torture videos. I reiterate these remarks. This seems like a good time.
Feingold announces his opposition to Mukasey. Good, even if moot.I hadn't intended to write about the sellout by Feinstein and Schumer; it was too depressingly predictable. And, as my essay.
Clarification, please:The president said it was not right for senators to press Mr. Mukasey about interrogation techniques on which he has not been briefed. When Mr. Bush was asked whether.
Jamie Mayerfeld contributes to the anti-Mukasey chorus:Mukasey's evasions prove his unfitness for the job. If the Senate confirms him, it will share responsibility for torture, because it will have knowingly.
I lay it out in a new article at TAP. This is a difficult question; I fully expected to support the nomination, and I certainly don't think that there will.