hillary clinton
It's good that the severe gender issues of MSNBC's election night anchor are finally getting some attention. The whole piece is worth reading, but I think Jamison Foer makes the.
Judith Warner is on a wave-making roll with her Domestic Disturbances column in the NY Times. Today she takes on the voice quiver heard 'round the world and asks: why.
The NYT has a very strange criticism of Hillary Clinton, which was also made by Dowd on Monday:Why Mrs. Clinton would compare herself to Mr. Johnson, who escalated the war.
Apparently Clinton has won outright. Basically a the worst plausible outcome from my perspective; Clinton wins despite expectations of a loss, Edwards obviously can't win the nomination but is strong.
Kerry Howley gets it right in responding to John Edwards affecting Manliness in response to Clinton briefly crying:Add to this useful list of the worst jobs in the world: consultant.
Dana is right, of course, that there was a considerable amount of sexism inherent in characterizations of Clinton's debate performance on Saturday. ("Medusa look," ugh.) This presents Democratic primary voters.
Reading about his disgusting ongoing smears of Obama, I can't say I'm any less broken up about Wanker Caucus President Bob Kerrey deciding to abjure a potential return to the.
I agree with Matt that 1)it was stupid of Obama's campaign to pick a fight with Paul Krugman, but 2)Krugman's point is very misguided. I don't think that Obama's rhetoric.