Scalia's attempt to use the nullification of masturbation bans as a scare tactic is definitely one of my favorite passages in the U.S. Reports.
I suppose the main attraction of formalism to judges is that it makes them feel like somebody or rather something else ("the law") is pulling the trigger. Thus morally outrageous.
I mentioned in my initial post about Caperton that it was a classic example of Scalia's showy rhetoric concealing substantive points of highly dubious quality. To unpack this a bit,.
The Supreme Court today held -- in a 5-4 decisions along predictable ideological lines -- that an FCC regulatory change that made broadcasters legally liable for broadcasting even fleeting, isolated.
No "law and" nonsense for you.After Scalia left [the University of Chicago Law School] it hired now-Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama and started offering classes like Obama's popular "Current issues.
The problem with apparently including cut-and-pasted segments from Sean Hannity transcripts to introduce your Supreme Court dissenting opinions is that your demagoguery may turn out to have a certain lack.
In light of Scalia once again dismissing those who consider Bush v. Gore less than a noble application of constitutional principle, this passage from his concurrence in Crawford can only.
Antonin Scalia continues to tell people to "get over" the disgraceful decision in Bush v. Gore. As he must know, that won't happen. Since he continues to do things like.
