I'm so sick of the Spitzer talk. Yet here I am.Jon Wiener over at the Nation's blog the Notion suggests how the Spitzer scandal is going to play out in the Democratic primary: it'll help Hillary Clinton because she--or any other woman--won't be a patron...
2008 democratic primary
For my part I think that the superdelegates should be able to consider whatever they want when deciding between Clinton and Obama, and if they want to take seriously the.
Ezra:If Hillary Clinton were a black man, it's unlikely that she would have been a national political figure for the past 15 years, as it's unlikely that she would have.
I think it was the best option for the Obama campaign.
That explains why there's nothing resembling a vote count in the Texas caucuses. I believe that the operative words are "in" and "ept."
Howard Dean says that delegates will not be seated based on the Michigan and Florida straw polls, but would be willing to sanction delegates based on an actual election agreed.
Kevin Drum, citing 1968, says that Democrat's needn't panic. I don't really buy the historical analogy for a reason that can be summed up in two words: George Wallace. Without him in the race to split the white supremacist vote that went for Goldwater in...
It looks increasingly likely: Obama, assuming something like his 10-point lead in the Texas caucuses holds up, will win Texas by the metric that actually matters for determining the nomination.
Ohio finally called for Clinton.It also looks increasingly like she'll narrowly win the vote in the Texas primary -- when was the last time that an updated vote count significantly.
Open thread...
My worth-very-little guess is that the most likely outcome is that (with Clinton winning OH and RI, and Obama carrying VT) Obama wins the delegates in Texas and Clinton squeaks.
Chris Bowers, in the context of discussing whether or not Obama is a progressive:Campaigning is often a sign of how someone will govern. In 2000, the Bush campaign ended up.