I have to concur with Matt; the destruction of Lebanese infrastructure cannot be seen as a proportional response to the kidnapping of Israeli soldiers. I like Israeli soldiers as much.
I think Matt is essentially right here with respect to some critics of the Mearsheimer/Walt article:Last, but certainly not least, is this: "We can -- and should -- debate the.
Restating what should be some obvious points...Israel has clear conventional superiority of Hezbollah and Lebanon, and can obviously do a lot of damage. However, the idea that Israel can destroy.
Like Ezra, I think that Ze'ev Schiff's assessment of the Iranian role in the Hezbollah attacks is plausible, with some caveats. The employment of a relatively modern surface to surface.
The problem with a precedent is, of course, that someone might follow it. Rodger writes:Given how the US reacted to the traumatic 9/11 attacks -- wars against Afghanistan and Iraq.
Remember when James Lileks gave an obscene, definitively chickenhawkish ("from my home in suburban Minnesota, I feel comfortable lecturing you for your unwillingness to engage in a suicidal revolutionary mission.
Echidne, Steve and Mahablog have already effectively covered this Times story about a new government study about public and private schools. There are two stories here: 1)the differences between the.
Make sure to read Kingdaddy's excellent series on the Barbary Wars:Part IPart IIPart IIIPart IVKingdaddy has some good observations, and makes some interesting parallels between the dilemmas facing the early.
- Restraint!
- The Maestro says it’s Mozart but it sounds like bubble gum
- No Kings!
- NFL Open Thread: the MAGA style in American sports
- The kids are alright
- The American NKVD
- The Party of the Working Class
- Hey Ezra Klein, here’s Charlie Kirk doing politics “the right way”
- Erik Visits an American Grave, Part 1,991
- Trump accurately sums up his presidenting