In the previous two posts (1, 2) in defense of Roe v. Wade, I argued that 1)Roe is a logical application of a long-standing constitutional tradition, and 2)The arguments that.
For the tenth month in a row, this year in Iraq was worse than last year. What do I mean? From April 2004 to January 2005, every single month has seen.
Now that this argument has officially become contrarian, I will explain why Roe v. Wade was correct on the merits. Before I begin, a few things to note about my.
#46 on this list reminded me of one of my most pleasant surprises of 2005. Although generally very conscious about changing the channel at the end of The Daily Show, early this year.
At Balkanization, Mark Graber makes a great point about the Summers fracas: Why does the president of Harvard focus only on those academic areas where superficial numbers suggest boys do slightly better.
Like a white knight (and I mean that in every sense of the phrase), Chuck Murray rides to the rescue of Larry Summers and all who would like to believe that.
I'm sure that this isn't literally without precedent, but the Steelers are 3 point underdogs today. I certainly can't remember a healthy home team being an underdog in a conference.
The best defense of Bush v. Gore was written by Richard Posner. It was still strikingly unpersuasive, but since Posner is a pragmatist it did have the advantage of not trying to.
- Update on the post-Dobbs Republican pivot to maternal care
- Reactionary beasts and the politics of law
- Erik Visits an American Grave, Part 1,823
- Hochul appears open to removing Donald Trump’s sock puppet
- Elon’s army of groyper incels coming for your Social Security data
- Demonstrations Today
- Intellectual death recorded
- Bezos spikes Anti-Musk ad
- A Note On Strategy
- Musk/Trump respond to increase in plane crashes with indiscriminate mass firings of people in an already understaffed agency