Author: Scott Lemieux
--In comments to this post, commenter Joe uncovers a remarkable fact about the SD ban on abortion: "In passing the bill, the Senate amended it to make it even more.
Well, it's official. The South Dakota legislature has passed an appalling (and unconstitutional) bill banning virtually all abortions in the state. (As some of you may remember, this legislation was.
And the Russians break a 3rd period scoreless tie on a powerplay resulting from an idiotic penalty taken by...Todd Bertuzzi! What a surprise! It's almost enough to make me believe.
There's something comforting in a way about reading the WSJ editorial page--neither rain nor sleet nor snow nor national security can prevent them from finding the union-busting angle in anything..
In a highly unsurprising decision, the Supreme Court agreed today to hear an appeal of (at least one of the many) Circuit court opinions striking down the Congressional ban on.
Busy day today, so I direct you to these fine posts: In yet another vindication of the yoosta-bees who deride liberals who have actually remained liberals for failing to perceive.
I'm not surprised that someone would write a post claiming that Anne Lamott's superb piece is "intolerant." Yes, because calling women who get abortions "murderers" is perfectly tolerant, but strongly.
In addition to the legal quirks, the recent 6CA case about the (nearly successful) efforts by the state to force an abortion clinic to close provides a good window into.
