Author: Scott Lemieux
In light of the decision of the DOJ, discussed by various law-talkin' people, to make prosecuting porn a "top priority"--apparently 9/11 "changed everything" by making counterterrorism less important--it's hard not.
...We bring you Gaggle!...and the Editors bring you funnier Mallard Fillmore. If he can make Day-to-Day funnier he would be the best blogger in world history, but that's a tall.
Lawyers, Guns and Money has received a tip explaining a great unsolved mystery. Apparently, the ill-fated plane carrying Roberto Clemente which tragically crashed while trying to deliver relief supplies to.
Mike Francesa just played the tapes from the Yankee radio broadcast from Friday, when Randy Johnson was ejected in the second inning. I hadn't heard it because I was watching.
Gee, I spend two posts setting up the British system as a model for a country that respects individual rights with no judicial review at all, and they start with.
In my previous post, I discussed the question of judicial review versus judicial supremacy. The reason I bring this up is to address the arguments that John Roberts made as.
This is, of course, great news. What's annoying is that it will hardly dim the cries that the Massachusetts judiciary is composed of out-of-control "activists" who imposed their will on.
In the course of a conservation I've been having with an extremely smart lawyer about John Roberts' arguments about Article III, I've been trying to clarify some thoughts about judicial.