Australia bans the use of social media by children under 16
By 
I know that social media can have some bad effects on teenagers, especially girls, but I’m not sure about this:
Australia’s parliament has passed a law that will aim to do what no other government has, and many parents have tried to: stop children from using social media. The new law was drafted in response to what the Labor prime minister, Anthony Albanese, says is a “clear, causal link between the rise of social media and the harm [to] the mental health of young Australians.”
On Thursday, parliament’s upper house, the Senate, passed a bill by 34 votes to 19 banning children under 16 from social media platforms.
But academics, politicians and advocacy groups have warned that the ban – as envisioned by the government – could backfire, driving teenagers to the dark web, or making them feel more isolated. There are questions about how it will work in practice. Many worry that the process has been too rushed, and that, if users are asked to prove their age, it could lead to social media companies being handed valuable personal data. Even Elon Musk has weighed in.
The online safety amendment (social media minimum age) bill bans social media platforms from allowing users under 16 to access their services, threatening companies with fines of up to AU$50m (US$32m) if they fail to comply. However, it contains no details about how it will work, only that the companies will be expected to take reasonable steps to ensure users are aged 16 or over. The detail will come later, through the completion of a trial of age-assurance technology in mid-2025. The bill won’t come into force for another 12 months.
On its face, this strikes me as an overbroad and draconian way of addressing a real problem. But I’d be curious what the parents out there think.
…Abigail in being smart in the comments:
As I understand it, there are major difficulties in implementing age verification that essentially kill online privacy for everyone. I assume I don’t need to explain how that can backfire on vulnerable populations, including children. I believe this is one of the objections that US-based activists have raised to KOSA – it would prevent children from seeking out information and support about things like queerness, reproductive health, or protection from abuse.
What this measure feels like is a last ditch effort to control the immense damage that social media is doing in the face of the fact that the actual social media companies are not going to do anything to stop it, and legislators would rather enact prohibition that force them to do it.