Drawing the boundaries around insanity
By More on this later, but the Court upheld the ability of the state to restrict the access domestic abusers have to firearms. The decision is 8-1, through Roberts, with only Crazy Uncle Clarence dissenting.
Again, this is not evidence of a “liberal” Court, but a Court so reactionary that even arguments that would have been laughed out of Court 20 years ago can get to the nation’s highest appellate Court. As Jackson says, the problem is Bruen, which makes virtually any anti-gun control argument plausible:
