Easy answers to silly concern trolling
By 
It’s going to be the opposite of fun watching radical centrist pundits use the vaccine mandate to justify overruling Roe v. Wade:
Conor is exemplifying the gamification of political discourse that a certain style of punditry has become. He's going for triple points: 1) hypocrisy-spotting/decrying, 2) both-sidesing, and 3) contemptuous mockery of a political slogan. But it's profoundly unserious. https://t.co/A9hGjDdwZp— David Watkins (@djw172) September 9, 2021
Ridiculous hypothetical (on purpose), but yes.
If you think women should have the right to abortion & restaurant workers should be required to wash their hands after using the bathroom, that's not at all inconsistent. Pointing out the combo isn't a gotcha.https://t.co/svAPiB28RZ— Nicholas Grossman (@NGrossman81) September 9, 2021
The trimester framework of Roe literally assumes that the viability of the fetus is precisely the point at which the state has an interest potentially strong enough to justify proscribing abortion. You can agree with this or not, but there is no tension whatsoever between this position and the Court’s longstanding holding that the state can maximize vaccines.
The Intellectual Horse Paste Web is going to expend a lot of effort trying to pretend that there’s a contradiction between believing in personal autonomy and believing that you can be prohibited from flying an airplane after you’ve consumed a handle of Maker’s Mark CHECKMATE LIBS! But the sign of the real pro will be those who can Whatabout their way into supporting the Fugitive Uterus Act but not vaccine mandates although the position makes no sense on any level. Do not try this at home!