Steiner’s counter-attack keeps getting delayed
By 
What does America’s leading jurisprudential expert on blowjobs have to say about recent developments?
The 2020 election “may be viewed as the election where the ultimate results are called into question” because of “the lack of integrity or the appearance of the lack of integrity in the process,” former Whitewater independent counsel Kenneth Starr told “Outnumbered Overtime” on Thursday. . .
“So it now obviously depends on what the other side, the Democrats, see fit to do,” he continued. “Shame on them if they say, as they may in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, we don’t want observers in. Really? You don’t want checks and balances? Why? You need to answer that question.”
The “problem with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court,” Starr said, is that “it is deeply partisan.”
Let’s not forget that James Bennet, of blessed memory before he was lynched by the PC mob, not so long ago gave this enormously hypocritical piece of shit valuable op-ed space in Even the Liberal New York Times, to defend the professional integrity of everybody’s favorite falangist.
Meanwhile, you know who else has always been very concerned about the supposed possible hypothetical appearance of impropriety?
America’s second-worst law professor Jonathan Turley makes a bold prediction:
