No you don’t remember anything at all

I plan to deal with this hilariously overwrought Charles C. W. Cooke aneurysm about judicial reform at a future date. But for some context let us look at some of the previous work published by his august publication on this subject:

Senator John McCain made minor headlines this week by stating that a Republican Senate might well be justified in refusing to confirm any nomination that a president Hillary Clinton might make to the Supreme Court. The only problem with such a statement is that it does not go far enough: The Senate should decline to confirm any nominee, regardless of who is elected. More than that, it is time to shrink the size of the Supreme Court.

Congress should pass a law reducing the Court’s membership to six Justices rather than nine — a return to its original size — and in so doing both take the question of Supreme Court appointments off the table for this election cycle and also thereby reduce the capability of the Court to engage in judicial activism harmful to the Constitution. And if the president vetoed such a bill, the Senate should accomplish the same thing by acting on its own, as an exercise of its “advice and consent” power.

I’m sure that Lord Cooke has a series of furious tweets denouncing this as the greatest scandal in known human history but oddly I have been unable to find them.

Incidentally, Paulsen isn’t just some rando; he’s an influential academic in Federalist Society circles whose recent book I saw on a remainder table was blurbed by Sam Alito.

Meanwhile, here’s John Cornyn standing athwart history shouting that it is unconscionable for Barack Obama to fill vacancies in the D.C. Circuit 9 months into his second term. I am beginning to think that Cooke’s arguments are not being made entirely in good faith!